Home / Jury instructions / HAWJIC 9.23
HAWJIC 9.23
ASSAULT AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER – INTENTIONAL, KNOWING OR RECKLESS
Hawaiʻi Pattern Jury Instructions — Criminal · 4/19/96 · compendium p. 297
Statutes:§707-712.5
Material elements — the prosecution must prove each beyond a reasonable doubt
material elements of the offense of Assault Against a Police Officer, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These four elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant caused bodily injury to a police officer; and
2. That the Defendant did so intentionally, knowingly or recklessly; and
3. That the Defendant did so to a police officer who was, at that time, engaged in the performance of his/her official duties as a police officer; and
4. That, at that time, the Defendant knew or recklessly disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the person was a police officer engaged in the performance of his/her official duties as a police officer.
ASSAULT AGAINST A POLICE OFFICER – INTENTIONAL, KNOWING OR RECKLESS: H.R.S. § 707-712.5(1)(a)
[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]
[The] Defendant, (defendant's name), is charged with the offense of Assault Against a Police Officer. A person commits the offense of Assault Against a Police Officer if he/she intentionally, knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to a police officer who is engaged in the performance of official duties.
There are four material elements of the offense of Assault Against a Police Officer, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These four elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant caused bodily injury to a police officer; and
2. That the Defendant did so intentionally, knowingly or recklessly; and
3. That the Defendant did so to a police officer who was, at that time, engaged in the performance of his/her official duties as a police officer; and
4. That, at that time, the Defendant knew or recklessly disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the person was a police officer engaged in the performance of his/her official duties as a police officer.
Notes H.R.S. §§ 707-712.5(1)(a), 702-206(1), (2) and (3). For definition of states of mind, see instructions: For definition of terms defined by H.R.S. Chapter 707, see instruction:
Also references
Verify against the current official HAWJIC compendium.