Home / Jury instructions / HAWJIC 12.19
HAWJIC 12.19
BRIBERY OF A WITNESS -- BRIBE OFFERING
Hawaiʻi Pattern Jury Instructions — Criminal · 04/19/96 · compendium p. 735
Statutes:§710-1070
Material elements — the prosecution must prove each beyond a reasonable doubt
material elements of the offense of Bribery of a Witness, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These three elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant [conferred] [offered] [agreed to confer], directly or indirectly, a benefit upon another person; and
2. That the other person was a [witness] [person that the Defendant believed was about to be called as a witness] in any official proceeding; and
3. That the Defendant did so with the intent to
[influence the testimony of that person] [induce that person to avoid legal process summoning him to testify] [induce that person to absent himself/herself from an official proceeding to which he/she has been legally summoned].
BRIBERY OF A WITNESS -- BRIBE OFFERING H.R.S. § 710-1070(1)
[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]
[The] Defendant, (defendant's name), is charged with the offense of Bribery of a Witness. A person commits the offense of Bribery of a Witness if he/she [confers] [offers] [agrees to confer], directly or indirectly, any benefit upon a [witness] [person he/she believes is about to be called as a witness] in any official proceeding with the intent to [influence the testimony of that person]
[induce that person to avoid legal process summoning him to testify] [induce that person to absent himself/herself from an official proceeding to which he/she has been legally summoned].
There are three material elements of the offense of Bribery of a Witness, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These three elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant [conferred] [offered] [agreed to confer], directly or indirectly, a benefit upon another person; and
2. That the other person was a [witness] [person that the Defendant believed was about to be called as a witness] in any official proceeding; and
3. That the Defendant did so with the intent to
[influence the testimony of that person] [induce that person to avoid legal process summoning him to testify] [induce that person to absent himself/herself from an official proceeding to which he/she has been legally summoned].
Notes H.R.S. §§ 710-1070(1), 702-206(1). For definition of states of mind, see instruction: For definition of terms defined by H.R.S. Chapter 710, see instructions:
Also references
Verify against the current official HAWJIC compendium.