Home / Jury instructions / HAWJIC 10.30

HAWJIC 10.30

Robbery in the Second Degree— Threatened Use of Force

Hawaiʻi Pattern Jury Instructions — Criminal · Revised 04/04/11 · compendium p. 578

Statutes:§708-841

Material elements — the prosecution must prove each beyond a reasonable doubt

material elements of the offense of Robbery in the Second Degree, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. These two elements are: 1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant was in the course of [committing theft] [taking of a motor vehicle without consent]; and 2. That [, while doing so,] the Defendant [intentionally] threatened the imminent use of force against the person of anyone who is present, with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property. [A person commits theft if he/she obtains or exerts unauthorized control over the property of another with intent to deprive the person of the property.] An act shall be deemed “in the course of [committing a theft] [taking a motor vehicle without consent]” if it occurs in an attempt to [commit theft] [take a motor vehicle without consent,] in the commission of [theft][taking a motor vehicle without consent] or in the flight after the attempt or commission.
Robbery in the Second Degree— Threatened Use of Force: H.R.S. § 708-841(1)(b) (Applicable to offenses occurring on or after June 22, 2006) [In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the] [The] Defendant, (defendant's name), is charged with the offense of Robbery in the Second Degree. A person commits the offense of Robbery in the Second Degree if, in the course of [committing theft] [taking a motor vehicle without consent], he/she threatens the imminent use of force against the person of anyone who is present, with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property. There are two material elements of the offense of Robbery in the Second Degree, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. These two elements are: 1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant was in the course of [committing theft] [taking of a motor vehicle without consent]; and 2. That [, while doing so,] the Defendant [intentionally] threatened the imminent use of force against the person of anyone who is present, with intent to compel acquiescence to the taking of or escaping with the property. [A person commits theft if he/she obtains or exerts unauthorized control over the property of another with intent to deprive the person of the property.] An act shall be deemed “in the course of [committing a theft] [taking a motor vehicle without consent]” if it occurs in an attempt to [commit theft] [take a motor vehicle without consent,] in the commission of [theft][taking a motor vehicle without consent] or in the flight after the attempt or commission. Notes H.R.S. §§ 708-841(1)(b), 708-842, 702-206(1). For definition of states of mind, see instruction: For definition of terms defined by H.R.S. Chapter 708, see instructions: For statutory defense to theft, see instruction 10.11A.

Notes & authorities

H.R.S. §§ 708-841(1)(b), 708-842, 702-206(1). For definition of states of mind, see instruction: For definition of terms defined by H.R.S. Chapter 708, see instructions: For statutory defense to theft, see instruction 10.11A.

Also references

Verify against the current official HAWJIC compendium.