Home / Jury instructions / HAWJIC 10.09A

HAWJIC 10.09A

CRIMINAL PROPERTY DAMAGE IN THE THIRD DEGREE

Hawaiʻi Pattern Jury Instructions — Criminal · Revised 5/3/18 · compendium p. 501

Statutes:§708-822

Material elements — the prosecution must prove each beyond a reasonable doubt

material elements of the offense of Criminal Property Damage in the Third Degree, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. These four elements are: 1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant damaged the property of another; and 2. That the Defendant did so without the other=s consent; and 3. That the damage to the property exceeded [$500*] [$100]; and 4. That the Defendant acted intentionally as to each of the foregoing elements.
CRIMINAL PROPERTY DAMAGE IN THE THIRD DEGREE: HRS § 708-822(1)(b) (Applicable to offenses that occurred on or before June 8, 2006) [In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the] [The] Defendant, (defendant’s name), is charged with the offense of Criminal Property Damage in the Third Degree. A person commits the offense of Criminal Property Damage in the Third Degree if he/she intentionally damages the property of another, without the other’s consent, in an amount exceeding [$500*] [$100]. There are four material elements of the offense of Criminal Property Damage in the Third Degree, each of which the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. These four elements are: 1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of (name of county), the Defendant damaged the property of another; and 2. That the Defendant did so without the other=s consent; and 3. That the damage to the property exceeded [$500*] [$100]; and 4. That the Defendant acted intentionally as to each of the foregoing elements. Notes HRS §§ 708-822(1)(b), 702-206(1). For definition of states of mind, see instruction: For definition of terms defined by HRS Chapter 708, see instructions: For prima facie inference and defense regarding Defendant's state of mind as to the value of the property, see instruction (valuation of property). However, “HRS § 708-801, by its clear terms, applies only when ‘the value of property or services is determinative of the class or grade of an offense.’ . . . HRS § 708-822 does not, on its face, require a determination of the value of property; HRS § 708-822 refers to the amount of damage done by the offender not the value of the property damaged.” State v. Pardee, 86 Hawai`i 165, 168, 948 P.2d 586, 589 (App. 1997) (emphasis added). The Intermediate Court also found that even if HRS § 708-801 was applicable to criminal property damage offenses, the value of the damaged items had been sufficiently proved. *The $500 amount is applicable to offenses that occur on or after June 17, 1996.

Notes & authorities

HRS §§ 708-822(1)(b), 702-206(1). For definition of states of mind, see instruction: For definition of terms defined by HRS Chapter 708, see instructions: For prima facie inference and defense regarding Defendant's state of mind as to the value of the property, see instruction (valuation of property). However, “HRS § 708-801, by its clear terms, applies only when ‘the value of property or services is determinative of the class or grade of an offense.’ . . . HRS § 708-822 does not, on its face, require a determination of the value of property; HRS § 708-822 refers to the amount of damage done by the offender not the value of the property damaged.” State v. Pardee, 86 Hawai`i 165, 168, 948 P.2d 586, 589 (App. 1997) (emphasis added). The Intermediate Court also found that even if HRS § 708-801 was applicable to criminal property damage offenses, the value of the damaged items had been sufficiently proved. *The $500 amount is applicable to offenses that occur on or after June 17, 1996.

Also references

Verify against the current official HAWJIC compendium.